ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: over resolving scans



Ok.  I was basing my statement on some old documentation for older Kodak
films.  Even there, I was off in that they run around 3.2 to 3.4.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of
> Anthony Atkielski
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:41 PM
> To: laurie@advancenet.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: over resolving scans
>
>
> Laurie writes:
>
> > I am not even sure that slide films developed
> > in E-6 under ordinary conditions achieve a
> > density rang of 3 or better.
>
> Both Provia and Velvia easily reach 3.4; Velvia reaches
> nearly 4.0 for blue
> and green.  This usable density range is spread over about
> nine stops of
> exposure for Provia, and around 6.5 stops for Velvia.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with
> 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the
> message title or body
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.