[filmscanners] Re: Compression >> Wide range digitalcameras

["Tony Sleep" <TonySleep@halftone.co.uk>]

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:17:48 -0400  Austin Franklin
(darkroom@ix.netcom.com) wrote:

> X-Envelope-From: darkroom@ix.netcom.com
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:17:48 -0400
> Message-ID: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJEEGOCFAB.darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
> Importance: Normal
> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20021012091029.058e67e0@pcug.org.au>
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
> X-Envelope-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> X-UIDL: _HlF.to2p9.sulphur
> Sender: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
> Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> To: tonysleep@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Compression >> Wide range digitalcameras
>
> Tony,
>
> > CCD sensors
> > can now achieve 14 stops range,
>
> What full frame imaging CCD sensors do that in a "normal" camera?  There
> are
> some that if you actively cool them, and control their environment, you
> might get that kind of response from them...but that's not really a
> usable
> device for a 35mm-esque type camera.

I don't know. I am going on the strength of an article I read some months
ago on the state of the art in CCD based cameras. It was primarily about
studio backs, not 35mm.


Regards

Tony Sleep - http://www.halftone.co.uk
Online portfolio & exhibit + film scanner info & comparisons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body