ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: No more Kodak CD-R's




Im thinking the same thing (I've also ordered another 100
Kodaks from the UK site - I can imagine their distro manager
getting excited at the sudden attention). What brands are
good - how do we know - how do we know theyre not rebadged ...

Im one of those aware that I will be reconsidering this in
the light of DVD-R taking over from CD - archival quality
will again become important. But then again, a 200 Gig disk
can hold a lot of archive data, and isnt that expensive, and
is a lot faster ... and still has at least a 1 year warranty.

This thread 'scared' me into rushing out to the garage, and up
to the loft, to get some very old CDRs (3 years) to check their
state - besides some apalling scans (Vuescan wasnt as good ...)
not one has gone bad. All dark stored/ dry conditions.

Where / who are the CDR archival reviews/ers.

bert

Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> None of this reassures me.  How were you able to tell where the Memorex CDs
> were actually manufactured?
>
> And if Memorex is no good, and Kodak has given up, where can I find very
> good CD-Rs?  I use these CD-Rs for archiving, so the longer they last, the
> better.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.