ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?



Anthony,

> Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
> Exactly the same thing was said of 32 bits, and 16 bits, and
> even 8 bits no
> doubt.

The CPU instruction width, as well as the data path width, has ABSOLUTELY
NOTHING to do with the memory space the CPU can address.  This clearly shows
your lack of understanding of the subject.

> Engineers _always_ get it wrong, and they _always_
> refuse to believe
> that they should build in more capacity for the future.

That's an ignorant generalization.

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.