> I have been in correspondence with the person involved with this website
> for many months now regarding this matter, and I do not find his claims
> to be unreasonable. He is not claiming better resolution. He is
> claiming better color fidelity with considerably less grain, dirt, dust,
> scratches and other surface defects with negatives on the Minolta Pro.
>
> The Minolta scanners, and in particular the Pro when used with negative
> film, tends to show great exaggeration of grain and surface defects.
> Due to my owning a Minolta Dual II which does not even have dICE, I was
> interested in this matter, because it too suffers from these problems.
Thanks Art, that makes things a lot clearer. The fact that the
Minoltas in question use a cold-cathode light source is a surprise to
me.
Andras
===========================================================================
Major Andras
e-mail: andras@users.sourceforge.net
www: http://andras.webhop.org/
===========================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body