ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: rebuild your scanner and get better results




> I have been in correspondence with the person involved with this website
> for many months now regarding this matter, and I do not find his claims
> to be unreasonable.  He is not claiming better resolution.  He is
> claiming better color fidelity with considerably less grain, dirt, dust,
> scratches and other surface defects with negatives on the Minolta Pro.
>
> The Minolta scanners, and in particular the Pro when used with negative
> film, tends to show great exaggeration of grain and surface defects.
> Due to my owning a Minolta Dual II which does not even have dICE, I was
> interested in this matter, because it too suffers from these problems.

Thanks Art, that makes things a lot clearer. The fact that the
Minoltas in question use a cold-cathode light source is a surprise to
me.

  Andras

===========================================================================
Major Andras
    e-mail: andras@users.sourceforge.net
    www:    http://andras.webhop.org/
===========================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.