on 12/10/2002 4:00 PM, filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk at
filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk wrote:
> You say, "Since I've been using my ls-8000 and shooting 6x9 I have become a
> little dissatisfied with my 35 images;" but it is unclear if this
> dissatisfaction stems from the particular scanner you are using for the 6x9
> versus the scanner you used to scan the 35mm or is contingent on the size of
> the film format or on the outcome of the printing process itself.
I scan both formats on the same scanner, at the same resolution. Thus it is
contingent on the size of the film format.
-Bruce
Visit my website at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~smthopr
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body