ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: My best scanner/film combinations



Oh yes, absolutely!  I was only talking about the film/scanning
properties.  I almost always do something to de-grain the sky, usually
manually.  As you say, it can be a significant workload, and even with the
best de-grainer you must lose something in the process.  I don't have GEM
but would like to, although have found viewscan's version of it to be
reasonable.

Julian

At 13:32 11/12/02, David wrote:
>Yes, but either GEM or NeatImage can clean this up quite nicely, albeit at a
>humongous cost in CPU time. (NeatImage takes 25 minutes for a 645 scan on a
>2.2 GHz PC. Sigh.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.