ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re:scanner purchase


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re:scanner purchase
  • From: "Tim Schooler" <tschooler@cox-internet.com>
  • Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 19:06:21 -0600
  • In-reply-to: <20021231001905.YOSC23536.fe3@wan-a-97.adsl.alcom.co.uk>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

At 12:00 AM 12/31/2002 +0000, you wrote:


>The lower Optical Density flatbeds have more than adequate resolution
>(eg Epson Perfection 3200) BUT will not capture all the shadow detail.



I saw a huge difference in image sharpness and detail moving from
an Epson 2450 to a Nikon 8000 for medium format scans. Shadow detail
is as you say greatly increased, but I can't believe how much of
a difference in resolution I saw.



        Best Regards,

        Tim Schooler

http://www.timschooler.com



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.