ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Newish Digital Tech




> > But the gotcha is that the sensor in the Foveon case is not at a single
> > depth, its a 'region' of doped silicon.  And so you are going to get an
> > averaged value, and you are also going to get some red
> propogating all the
> > way to the Blue and Green sensors quantum mechanically - ie
> > probablistically.
> >
> > So you can probablistically compensate for it, but its going to
> take time
> > for them to tune the compensations.
>
> Good description of the mechanism.
>
> Finding the right arithmetic to sort out the R, G and B values is simply a
> matter of building a profile, something that is routinely done with a
> standard target and profiling software.

Paul,

It is ONLY that simple if there is repeatability and consistency.  Neither
of which I am convinced the Foveon sensor has.

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.