Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Newish Digital Tech
"Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>>>>>>>>
The point is that the more photons you capture, the less noise you get.
Assuming the Foveon wastes the same percentage of its area on interconnect
as a Bayer pattern chip, the Bayer chip will filter out all the "wrong"
color photons that hit each sensor, while the Foveon will actually use them.
<<<<<<<<<
But it's a different fabrication/sensor technology, so you don't know how it
will compare until you try it. And the SD9 isn't all that impressive in
either sensitivity or noise.
>>>>>>>>>
Obviously, implementation matters. But I see no reason to expect that a
Bayer pattern chip is intrinsically better--it's just been worked on longer.
<<<<<<<<<
This is exactly right. There's no reason to expect that a Bayer pattern chip
is intrinsically better. There's also, so far, no proof that the Foveon chip
is enough better to be worth the hype.
David J. Littleboy
davidjl@gol.com
Tokyo, Japan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|