ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Newish Digital Tech




> >Hum.  Do you have a source for that?  I don’t believe that is
> >true, and will
> >have to think about your assertion.  What is the source of the “random
> >variations”?  I know there is some randomness in reception of photons,
> >simply because of atmospheric dispersion, and other causes...
>
> I think he is talking about the quantum noise which is introduced
> due to the
> Poisson probability distribution of the Photons hitting the detector. The
> resulting error in the signal is proportional to sqrt(2).

Hello Robert,

If he is, that’s called “shot noise” and it’s = sqrt(S), where S is the
signal in electrons.  It certainly is the noise that limits CCD performance.

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.