ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Newish Digital Tech



Hi Winsor,

> > Also, this issue about “%100 of the light” keeps being stated by most
> > everyone who “champions” the Foveon.  Even if it were true, it’s a
matter of
> > significance.

> > The low light performance of the Foveon is not
> > very good, in fact.

> However one of the tests done by dpreview.com is ISO sensitivity and
> noise.  The side by side frames they show seem to indicate that the
> Canon D60 and EOS 1Ds both have a similar noise floor at high ASA
> while the Foveon chip in the Sigma has much less noise than either of
> the Canons at similar low light settings.  Or are you talking about
> something else.

No, the noise floor is not what I’m talking about, that is a separate issue.
My second statement is based on images I’ve seen like this:

http://www.pbase.com/image/10390721

And my first statement is currently what is being discussed.

Regards,

Austin



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.