ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: CO2



May I suggest the puurrrfect solution:

If one uses Nitrous Oxide, you not only save the planet, but you have fun
while cleaning your pix..:-)

Preben


----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Doucette" <camera911@cogeco.ca>
To: <krille@tin.it>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: CO2


AND let us not forget that Nitrogen also absorbs moisture and is NOT a
greenhouse gas, which is to say that its ODP is ZERO.
(ODP = Ozone Depletion Potential)



At 12:36 AM 1/24/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>Is there any reason that using CO2 is superior to using compressed Nitrogen
>cylinders?
>
>Nitrogen is an inert substance and is a major component of air (about 80%).
>
>---
>Jerry M. Pine
>San Jose, CA
>
>Photographs are made, not taken.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.