ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Filmscanners - is this about as good as itgets?



Hi Sam,

> This surprised me, but only because I didn't remember it being said
> in the many digital-vs-film discussions I've seen. That is, it didn't
> surprise me because I doubt it. It's just that the digital-vs-film
> war seems to be conducted so much on the resolution/sharpness/detail
> front.
>
> How PopPhoto defines and tests color accuracy, I don't know. But I
> assume prints are not involved. And that color management with
> profiles and, beyond that, color correction via case-by-case
> adjustments is sometimes needed no matter how accurately the colors
> are captured, and regardless of how they're captured.

It's kind of a red herring...because you can, of course, adjust any and all
of the colors to perfectly match anything you want...with any digital file.

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.