ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Filmscanners - is this about as good asitgets?



> From: Bob Frost [mailto:bob@frost.name]
>
> Fuji may just have come up with a solution to that problem. They are
> reported to have a chip with a second layer of detectors under
> the first, so
> that the second layer only detects the very bright light that
> saturates the
> top layer. By merging the two they claim to be able to extend the dynamic
> range of the image.

According to the Fuji presentation, the less sensitive sensors aren't
"under" the more sensitive ones--they're next to them. And while they refer
to the improvement as a 400% increase, that's only true on a linear
scale--on a log scale, that adds two bits of resolution.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.