Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: Canon IDs vs Pentax 67II
> >I'm kidding... I am also surprised by the results. The drum scan does
> >show a lot more resolution than his Imacon scan. And the close up shows
> >that there is no detail on the windows from the digital while the film
> >has a good amount.
> >
> I don't think he's denying that. His (Michael R.'s) point was that he
> liked the 1Ds 13x19 prints (or was it 12x18?) better than the MF prints.
> And that's very much in line with what he had to say a few years ago
> about the D30 vs 35mm scans: he liked the D30 8x10 (ok, up to 11x14 if
> ressed up) prints better. To me that sounds reasonable.
Petru,
It's the "better" than what I question when he does his comparisons. If he
is lousy at film and scanning, then his conclusion is no surprise...and he
should be if he's going to do testing like this, and claim to be an
expert...but my take is he's not very good at film and scanning...so that
draws into question the validity of his conclusions.
Austin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
