ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] 16 vs 8bit scans


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] 16 vs 8bit scans
  • From: "Ed Verkaik" <verkaik@sympatico.ca>
  • Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 16:09:27 -0500
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

I'm new to scanning, using a Nikon 4000ED on PC.  I've been scanning in
14bit mode, doing some cleanup and adjustments, and resaving as 16bit
TIFF masters.  What I wonder is... how many of you do your adjustments
in 16 vs 8bit, and does it matter for final quality either way? Also,
would a native 8bit scan using NikonScan be as good as if  it had been
converted to 8bit in PS7?

Thanks.
Ed Verkaik


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.