ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 16 vs 8bit scans




> > I'm new to scanning, using a Nikon 4000ED on PC.  I've been scanning in
> > 14bit mode, doing some cleanup and adjustments, and resaving as 16bit
> > TIFF masters.  What I wonder is... how many of you do your adjustments
> > in 16 vs 8bit, and does it matter for final quality either way? Also,
> > would a native 8bit scan using NikonScan be as good as if  it had been
> > converted to 8bit in PS7?
>
> Experience shows that eight bits is fine...

Hi Paul,

Please be careful when you claim that.  For color, and with your caveats,
that is correct...but for B&W, that is not.  Tonal manipulations should not
be done to 8 bit data.

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.