Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: ArtixScan 1800f recomendations
- To: lexa@lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] Re: ArtixScan 1800f recomendations
- From: "HPA" <tom@historicphotoarchive.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:20:05 -0800
- In-reply-to: <200302230024.QAA22201@technicaladvantage.net>
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
The Epsons and the new Cannon all appear to have glass. Because i need
quality, I need a film scanner without the glass. From another post on
another list, it appears that the Epson glass can not be removed (even for
cleaning). Does anyone have any thoughts on modifying either of these to do
film scanning without glass? thanks
Tom Robinson
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 07:17:00 -0500
> From: "Bernie Kubiak" <bkubiak@attbi.com>
> ----------------------------------------
> The Epson 2450 does what you're looking for and the new 3200 should =
> improve
> on that.
> Subject: [filmscanners] ArtixScan 1800f recomendations
>
> My old scanner is dead, need to replace it now, I am thinking of the
> ArtixScan 1800f. Anyone have any experience good or bad?
>
> I need a glassless trannie scanner for all sizes larger than 35mm (I =
> already
> have a Polaroid 4000 for 35mm). My goal is excellent 13x19 prints on a
> 2200. The neg sizes vary up to 8x10, there are 500 photographers files
> spanning 125 years of work here, both color and B/W.. Mac G4 OS9.1 =
> thanks.
>
> Tom Robinson
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|