ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: JPEG2000/PNG on PS7.0 and PSP8.0





>-----Original Message-----
>From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Julian Robinson
>your figures for the compression ratios fo JPEG2000 seem very low
>to me, I am interested to know why.  I get more towards 2:1 mostly, with
>the worst figure ever around 15% and an average around 40%.  You get an
>average around 12%.  Perhaps my images are lacking detail, or are yours
>especially grainy? Not criticising, just would like to have a handle on all
>this.

One other possibility is that he works with 16-bit TIFFs and you with 8-bit
TIFFs. If you go beyond 8 bits the compression ratio falls pretty fast. As a
matter of fact, jpeg2000 even allows to bypass parts of the algorithm after
5 bitplanes because compression is not very significant anymore (because
there isn't much correlation anymore). Therefore, for images with many
bitplanes it makes sense to use a bigger compression ratio as not that much
is lost.

Robert

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.