ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: IT8 calibration queries



Al writes ...

> shAf replied ...
>
> >   Any accurate IT8 (and its reference file), should do only 2 things (1)
> > calibarate your scanner's interpretation of color, and (2) provide a
> > realistic measure of its gamut.  It can be argued neither of
> these are film
> > dependent, and are only scanner dependent.
>
> That makes sense.  In that case, the only potential benefit that
> I can see from different targets would be if one had a wider or
> different gamut than the other.  Anyone know whether the Kodak or
> Fuji targets have significantly different gamuts?

  You might also want to investigate HutchColor ... i.e., I have seen many
kudos
http://hutchcolor.com/hct.htm

  ... but I suspect its patch pattern may not be compatible with Vuescan,
but you could check at the newgroup <news:comp.periphs.scanners>

cheerios ... shAf  :o)
Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland
www.micro-investigations.com (in progress)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.