[filmscanners] Re: keeping the 16bit scans; now=HD longevity OT

["Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca>]

I think by the time they are speaking about 100,000 rpm drives, they
will be onto a fully different storage method, using some type of static
RAM or whatever.  Either that or you will be heating your home with your
computer ;-)

Art

owenpevans wrote:

> Hi Art,
> Thankyou for the information. It was most educational. In fact this type of
> drive has been around for several years and abandoned by my industry for
> it's ineptitude at the plus 100,000 rpm speeds which we require. It's
> interesting that this has found a new application.
> In what I read, they are trying to get these to go 14,400 rpm and when they
> achieve this they'll desire to go to double that. Thereafter, it'll be
> interesting to see what technology is employed for higher speeds? Maybe
> there's a secondary market for my company's technology?
> I'll wait & see. Once again thankyou for the enlightenment.
>
> Owen P. Evans
> J.33.3
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body