Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: comments on using NikonScan/PC
- To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] RE: comments on using NikonScan/PC
- From: "Nagaraj, Ramesh" <Ramesh.Nagaraj@ca.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:49:36 -0500
- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Thread-index: AcL6jibap6twTQXZSlG3E+drl09k7AAU95sw
- Thread-topic: [filmscanners] Re: comments on using NikonScan/PC
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
>From: Arthur Entlich [mailto:artistic-1@shaw.ca]
>I wonder if your processor is leaving a bit too much silver in the
>final film after processing. In theory, there should be very little to
May be due to lab. I have 8 rolls, all developed in same lab.
4 of them as Kodak and 4 are Fuji.
>I think the IR channel can be made visible with Vuescan (maybe Nikon
>also offers this). I would take a good look at it. With the above
>mentioned films, the IR image should almost be nonexistent, except for
>where there is dust, finger prints, scratches or other surface or film
>base defect. If you are seeing a very distinct image in the IR channel,
>either your scanner is not "tuned" to the proper IR frequencies, or your
>film has way too much silver still residing in it after processing.
I will look in to IR output on vuescan.
Thanks for education.
Thanks
Ramesh
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|