Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: comments on using NikonScan/PC
- To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] RE: comments on using NikonScan/PC
- From: "Nagaraj, Ramesh" <Ramesh.Nagaraj@ca.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 19:49:47 -0500
- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Thread-index: AcL7Bc02C7D/bW6tR06gt6b7MX+OcgAB4KHA
- Thread-topic: [filmscanners] Re: comments on using NikonScan/PC
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
>From: Ed Verkaik [mailto:verkaik@sympatico.ca]
>Very interesting. I would really like to get to the truth on this, darn
>it! I hope Jack Phipps will comment further on your specific example,
>because I want to know ONCE-AND-FOR-ALL whether ICE (as implemented in
>the 4000ED) set to "notmal" will or will not degrade an image.
I will try to do some test scans and post the images on the net.
Thanks
Ramesh
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
