ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Film and Nikon D100 - my comparison shots



Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Film and Nikon D100 - my comparison shots
Date: Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 10:51:41AM +0200
Quoting Alessandro Pardi:
> thanks for sharing these results. I fully agree with your comments about the
> D100 resolution (or lack thereof), what surprises me slightly is your choice
> of shooting slides rather than negatives for your "important" work. Slides
> may be less grainy (although comparison here is not truly fair as you shot a
> 200ASA negative and a 100ASA slide), but negatives are *way* easier to scan
> (at least for the 4000ED and scanners in the same league). No matter how
> hard I tried, couldn't get the Provia crop to look as good as the Superia
> crop.
> YMMV, especially if you have access to drum scanners.

Hmm,
So far the film scans that I tried where vastly inferior to my slide scans
(both consumer grade fuji material) in a Canon FS4000.

It's in the shop now because of the noise, I'll try scanning some portra
when it comes back, maybe that is better.

--
Andreas Siegert
afx@muc.de
www.crash.muc.de

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.