ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Canon FS4000US


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Canon FS4000US
  • From: "Peter Klein" <pklein@2alpha.net>
  • Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 19:03:52 -0700
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

While we're on the subject of the Canon FS4000US...

I just got one.  I'm upgrading from a Nikon LS-2000, which I used
exclusively with VueScan.  If anyone has tips to help get over the
transition and learning curve, I'd love to hear them.

I'm wondering if I should stick with VueScan or use FilmGet.  I tend to do
all adjustments after the scan.  I like to get all possible detail in the
scan and then fix the black and white points (etc.) in the image
editor.  B&W is my first love, but I shoot color as well.

Is FARE more effective than VueScan's IR cleaning or vice versa?  One thing
I noticed was that in VueScan, the FS4000 did *two* passes when infrared
cleaning was on.  I don't know if that happens when running FARE within
FilmGet.

Thanks,
--Peter Klein
Seattle

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.