Just would lie to thank to all contributors to this thread.
The things now more or less clarified.
Hope to invote all of you to my soon-to-be-born web site galleries.
Regards, Alex
--- Tim Atherton <tim@KairosPhoto.com> wrote:
> everything you need to know about copyright registration in the US:
>
>
>
>
>
> PS - Israel is a signatory to the Bern Convention
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> > [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Arthur
> Entlich
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:27 PM
> > To: tim@KairosPhoto.com
> > Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Web images copyright
> >
> >
> > You may well be correct.
> >
> > (Art slowly backs out of room without, turning his back ... ;-))
> >
> > Art ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> > LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
> >
> > > I beg to differ. While we may be arguing sematics, it was the
> case even
> > > under the legislation and interpretation that you are referring
> > to that a
> > > collection was considered a body of work as long as the
> > submitter gave the
> > > collection of diverse individual items the same single name -
> such a
> > > Collected Photographs From Jan., 1950, to Feb., 1950, by XXXX
> > XXXX. This
> > > single umbrella title sufficed the copywrite office as defining
> > a collection
> > > as a single body of work. The change in the law, I believe,
> merely
> > > eliminated the requirement that the collection be a body of
> > work as a legal
> > > formality.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> > > [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Arthur
> Entlich
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 6:33 PM
> > > To: laurie@advancenet.net
> > > Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Web images copyright
> > >
> > >
> > > Actually, I'm not sure that's completely true. As I recall,
> there was a
> > > change in the US copyright registration law, or at least a
> clarification
> > > or interpretation change of it, way back in the late '70's.
> > >
> > > It used to read that a collection of work could be copyrighted
> under one
> > > registration, but the proviso was that the pieces had to be
> considered a
> > > body of work which had some type of continuity, such as a book of
> > > images, or articles, an exhibit, etc. There was a change in
> either the
> > > wording or interpretation made back some time ago, that even a
> > > collection of diverse art, or a grouping that didn't have a
> specific
> > > theme or purpose could still be registered as a grouping.
> > >
> > > Art
> > >
> > >
> > > LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>They always have permitted the bulk colpyrighting of groups of
> images
> > >>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------------------
> > Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with
> > 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
> > or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the
> > message title or body
> >
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message
> title or body
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
