ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: umax film scanners


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: umax film scanners
  • From: "Bruce" <smthopr@earthlink.net>
  • Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 19:08:16 -0700
  • In-reply-to: <200307061627.19ziUS6cf3NZFlr0@killdeer>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

on 7/6/2003 4:00 PM, filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk at
filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk wrote:

> you need at least 4000
> dpi to do a reasonable job of scanning 35mm so as to reproduce it at even
> snapshot enlargemetns without any cropping.

I've got some nice 13x19 in prints from my old 2700dpi nikon, even with some
cropping. 4000dpi is better, but only about 20% better.


-Bruce

Visit my website at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~smthopr

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.