[filmscanners] RE: scanner dmax discussion

["LAURIE SOLOMON" <laurie@advancenet.net>]

Austin,
We have been through this discussion several times over; I am not about to
embark on it again, much less start it. :-)  That topic has always provoked
heated discussions involving misused terminology and misunderstood concepts
with everyone claiming theirown use to be the proper and correct usage
unlike that of others whom they are debating.  Rather than solving vagueness
and ambiguity by trying to settle on a common set of terms have a commonly
understood denoted concepts, arguments erupt over language and whose notion
is the real one.


-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Austin Franklin
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:31 PM
To: laurie@advancenet.net
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: scanner dmax discussion


> Interesting discussion at rec.photo.equipment.large-format and
> comp.periphs.scanners
>
> Relation of bit depth to dynamic range

That subject, for some reason, seems to be a very heated topic.
Unfortunately, due to marketing misinformation, it's a very misunderstood
concept...

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body