ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Checking and the new Minolta 5400filmscanner



On 5/8/03 11:35 pm, "David J. Littleboy" <davidjl@gol.com> wrote:

> 
> From: "Håkon T Sønderland" <hts@antares.no>
>>>>>>>>>> 
> Simon Lamb wrote:
>> Håkon
>> 
>> There is a hands on review at http://www.photo-i.co.uk
>> 
>> 
> Thank you. I found it hard to tell the quality of scans
> from the pictures there, but the reviewer sounded quite
> pleased with the unit.
> <<<<<<<<<<<
> 
> Really. From those images, it seemed that doubling the resolution provided
> no improvement whatsoever. But that appears to be quite wrong. Try this
> nicely done page by Bart van der Wolf:
> 
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~bvdwolf/main/foto/scan/se5400/se5400.htm
> 
> David J. Littleboy
> Tokyo, Japan
> 

A shame Bart didn't provide an insight into using the built in diffuser on
the scans of the child rather than showing us how poorly Neatimage gets rid
of grain and softens the image.

Guess we still need to wait for a definitive review.

Simon

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.