Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: NeatImage:
- To: lexa@lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] Re: NeatImage:
- From: "" <nick.grasso@hrads.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 14:21:38 -0400
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
Preston Earle wrote:
>>>I downloaded the free trial version of Neat Image some time ago (file is
dated November, 2001). I have tried numerous times to use it and have
yet to get an image what was *any* better than the original. Does anyone
have any suggestions as to how to manipulate the settings to get good
results, even as part of a testing process? Has the commercial version
changed so much that the version I have is out-dated? I'm trying it on
medium-quality JPG files from a ScanDual II scanner (3800x2500pixels).
Do I need to save scans as TIF's to use Neat?<<<
They completely changed the user interface since then, so you may want to
try it again. I believe they have a quick start tutorial on their website,
if it isn't included with the program. I'm surprised you haven't seen any
improvement. For me, it improves almost every image I try it on. It has
lots of settings that take a while to learn how to use, but just using the
default settings almost always gives me a better image. Also, I believe it
works on both JPG and TIF and the new 'Pro Plus' version includes a
Photoshop plugin as well as the standalone. Give it another try.
Nick
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|