ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: OT: DVD formats




----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Atherton" <tim@KairosPhoto.com>
To: <ewen@chimpy.freeserve.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:03 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] OT: DVD formats



Anyone know anything about the merits of the different DVD-R/RW formats?

I'm just looking at recording data (image files obviously), not movies etc.
Is there one that is more mainstream? Pros and cons?

thanks

tim


A recent photo magazine (AP) reckons DVD-R is ok for data, but DVD+R is more
likely to work in domestic DVD players - i.e. for video. Microsoft are
backing DVD+R as the universal format in future operating systems
development. For long term archiving, I would hedge on +R

I'm not sure what the technical difference is but we had this discussion at
work when ordering a shed load of blank disks for our dual format burners.

Ewen


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 20/08/2003

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.