ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: 8 bit versus 16




"Henk de Jong" <henk@hsdejong.nl> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>

Simply stated: I think Arthur is wrong!  ;-)
<<<<<<<<<<<

Me too, but on to happier things...

>>>>>>>>>>>
I have several images on my web photo galleries who gave me a headache with
posterisations in the (monochromatic) blue skies while editing.
A photo editing program working with 16 bit/channel and feeding it with the
maximum available bit-depth from the scanner would be the solution.
Unfortunately PSP (PS is to expensive for me) is working only with 8
bits/channel.
<<<<<<<<<<<<

Picture Window Pro is 16-bits throughout. Everywhere.

http://www.dl-c.com/Temp/

There's a new version out with Neat Image like noise reduction/sharpening.

The bad news, though, is that 16-bits per channel is not a panacea. If the
original data is bad, editing will make it worse. And scanner output is
pretty funky.

David J. Littleboy
davidjl@gol.com
Tokyo, Japan

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.