ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more



Frank,

> By low end scanners, do you mean something like the Polaroid SS4000?
> Because VueScan produces much better scans than Polacolor Insight.

Viewscan, nor Insight, nor any scanner software "produces" the scans, the
scanner and the scanner operator does.  Perhaps it's true that for someone
who wants the software to simply "hand" then a scan, Viewscan does a better
job at automating the process.  I find setting setpoints and adjusting tonal
curves quite easy.  Or, perhaps for scanners that aren't all that good, all
the extra processing options in Viewscan can be very beneficial.

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.