ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more



Thanks for that info Bob.  Does the Nikon 4000 "suffer" from any focus
issues, at least in your experience (assuming you have one)?

BTW, do you think the IR dust removal works well?  It seems to me that it's
(dust problem) exacerbated on scanners that use point light sources, like
LEDs...  I've literally got no experience what so ever with any of this
"extra" processing that the newer scanners have...as my scanner doesn't have
any of these issues that this seem to mitigate...

Regards,

Austin

> It is with the Nikon 4000. Vuescan simply saves it as an extra channel if
> you ask it to. You can then look at it and see what it has marked for
> removal.
>
> Bob Frost.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Austin Franklin" <austin@darkroom.com>
>
>   The IR data is simply a fourth channel, and could
> easily be passed on if designed to do so.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.