Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan vs Insight: what is better about Vuescan? (was 24 bit vs more)
- To: lexa@lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan vs Insight: what is better about Vuescan? (was 24 bit vs more)
- From: "" <petru.lauric@rcn.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:32:06 -0400
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:23:30 -0700
>From: "Frank Paris" <frankparis@comcast.net>
>Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Vuescan vs Insight: what is
better about Vuescan? (was 24 bit vs more)
>To: petru.lauric@rcn.com
>> Last I checked the
>> slide results were fairly comparable but the negatives were a
>> lot easier to scan with VueScan.
>
>That's interesting. I've always had a lot more problems with
negatives
>than slides with VueScan. I get much more consistent results
with slides
>and have to muck around in PS much less. I wonder what the
differences
>are in our workflow or our scanner model, or both?
I meant to say that Insight and Vuescan results were
comparable when scanning slides and that it was easier to scan
negatives with VueScan than with Insight.
Of course, slides are a lot easier to scan (for me, anyway).
The thing I detest the most when scanning negatives is the
grain aliasing.
Regards,
Petru.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|