ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: TMAX 3200 scanning


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: TMAX 3200 scanning
  • From: "don schaefer" <send2ds@mac.com>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:39:51 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <200310102304.h9AN4LWT005045@mac.com>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

I read that the Nikon LS4000 has enough resolution to scan both the
grain and the area between the grain (as opposed to "clumping grain"
problems with the LS2000 which I experienced to a disturbing degree).
This is not enough reason alone to buy the scanner, however. What makes
the most sense to me is to make a very sharp darkroom print with a wide
tonal range and scan it on a hi-res flatbed like the Epson 3200.
Result: huge file size (if you need it), minimal grain. Do what you
want in Photoshop.
>
>  Minolta Dimage Scan
> Elite 5400 might work well?

It has some diffusion gate that is supposed to address the problem, but
how well, with a grainy film like 3200 is questionable.

Don Schaefer

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.