ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Photoshop CS



I just stepped up from PS-Elements2 to PS-CS (version 8) .. at USD 299
for the upgrade .. thanks for the heads-up in this forum.

So far it looks familiar except for the new features compared to
Elements.  I like the 16bit per channel -- it was in fact what cinched
my decision for PS-CS vis-a-vis Picture Window PRO-3.5, a less costly
16bit image editor, with a steeper learning curve for me.

After following the discussion of the merits of 8 vs 16 bit  -- my
digicam's A/D converter is 14 bits, I scan my film and pics at 16 bit --
the argument comes down to 16bit image editing and then saving the end
product in 8bit with the expectation of a better end-result.  Thus the
new PS-CS promises to be a great tool for a quasi-amateur like me.

Thus I would be most interested in what is the assessment of PS-CS in
the 'filmscanners' community?

Frank K-F

filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk wrote:

> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Topic: ADMIN  - TEST  -  PLEASE IGNORE
> =================================
> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:30 +0000 (GMT)
> From: TonySleep@halftone.co.uk (Tony Sleep)
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Regards
>
> Tony Sleep - http://www.halftone.co.uk
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.