Yeah, that's right, it is Nikon Adobe 1998 (I used to assume it is
similar to just plain Adobe 1998 RGB). For an archival purposes I just
keep the original format (i.e. Nikon Adobe 1998) and do not bother of
converting one to a regular Adobe 1998. If I'll reveal later the need
for such, I can do it any time.
Once I need to convert to sRGB I do it as almost the final step - just
prior to comressing and saving as JPEG.
Alex
--- Ed Verkaik <verkaik@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> From: "Alex Z" <alexzfoto@yahoo.com>
> Once begining my scanning experience I set scanner's output format as
> Adobe 98 RGB, do all the necessary editing in PS7, and save for an
> archive as Adobe 98 RGB either.
> >
>
> Ok, but the files are tagged "Nikon Adobe 1998" out of the scanner.
> Do
> you leave that as is or convert to the standard "Adobe RGB 1998" ...
> and
> why? I guess they're meant to be similar, but I wonder if there's
> any
> harm "converting" the profile to the standard Adobe one?
>
> Am I right in assuming that the profile conversion should be done
> before
> any PS editing, or (in the case above) does it matter?
>
> Ed Verkaik
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message
> title or body
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
