Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: Better DOF than Nikon?
> From: Arthur Entlich
>
> Without trying to be cute, basically any of them. This is a problem
> with the LED lighting system Nikon uses. The cold cathode tube lighting
> used by most scanners is simply brighter and allows for the lens to be
> closed down further, allowing for more depth of field.
How much better are they? Will a Minolta (for instance) handle my rippled
slides just fine, or will it be only somewhat better? I'm trying to decide
whether I should invest in a new scanner, or fix the old one. I wish
scanners had standardized DOF specs.
--
Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
Paul mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
