Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: Better DOF than Nikon?
> From: arm
>
> The Minolta works great, have had no problems. Also have
> an L-8000
> which can do 35mm but the Minolta is much easier to use. I use the
> LS-8000 for MF and also have edge blur. I guess to compare apples with
> apples I should compare with an LS-4000 which I think is very similar to
> the Minolta as far as ease of use. I scan at 5400dpi and have no
> problems. I truth I have had them both for a short time (less than a
> month) so have not really run a comparison by doing several negatives and
> slides in both machines to see how much of a difference the
> 5400dpi is with the 4000dpi of the LS-8000.
Is it likely that a medium format scanner will have greater DOF than a 35mm
scanner, just because it needs it for larger pieces of film?
--
Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
Paul mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
