ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: NikonScan problem



> From: Dieder Bylsma
>
> Kodachrome is a quirky little beast to deal with, especially with
> Nikonscan.
> In fact for that reason alone do I end up using Vuescan for doing large
> quantities of Kodachrome. Otherwise it's just too frustrating to
> fight with
> Nikonscan.
>
> As to your test results, yes, I've seen that with NikonScan
> before with the
> LS-2000, the LS-4000. I wonder how the LS-5000 will portray Nikonscan.
>
> NScan 3.x has a 'Kodachrome' film type. What happens if you
> fiddle with that?
> Likewise, what happens if you A:B the "Processed" vs "Natural" tabs?

I've been Googling since my first message, and have found a number of
references to blue casts on Kodachrome with the Nikon scanners. The weird
thing is that I've owned the LS-2000 for several years, and before this
year-long hiatus had scanned at least a hundred Kodachrome slides without
seeing anything like this.

Where is this "Kodachrome" film type specified in NikonScan?

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.