ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Better DOF than Nikon?



Hi Paul

           Been thinking of your warped slides.

           If you got some slide mounts with glass, but instead of mounting
them normally with the slide film between the two pieces of glass, you mount
them with both the glasses on the "outer" side of the warped film.

          This way the glass would flatten the negative to perhaps where the
DOF of the scanner is sufficient.

          I don't have any of the mounts around to try it.   I do not know if
you would get too many Newton rings etc.     Diffraction?.

          Might be worth a try.

          Best,   Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.