Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Better DOF than Nikon?
Paul sent me a couple of his "cooked" slides to test with a few scanner
for him. I too thought these could by flattened by all the usual
methods, such as those you state below, until I saw them! Warped is a
kind word. These mounts are charcoal broiled, and the base layer of the
film frames is literally melted. There is no method that would truly
flatten these other than perhaps two well clamped down pieces of thick
glass.
They are painful to look at!
Art
Michael Creem wrote:
> Another solution might be to use Wess plastic mounts. They have a version
> that has pegs in the mount that match the sprocket holes in 35mm film and
> they hold the film very flat without having to deal with glass. They come in
> a version that shows the full 35mm frame. I think that Wess has been sold
> but I think that someone else is making the mounts. They are very good.
> Michael Creem
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@ix.netcom.com>
> To: <mcreem@worldnet.att.net>
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 9:07 PM
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Better DOF than Nikon?
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
