ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: another Sharpening question



Well, if you insist then the answer is no.

But I could have, if you allowed me to ;-) to make an argument
otherwise.  In general (I'm assuming these were captured with a CCD
sensor) some unsharp masking benefits the image.  However, you're the
ones with the images, you know the application, and you can best test
the results to see if the benefits justify the time and energy.

Art

Ed Verkaik wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am seeking an opinion about the purpose for sharpening a certain type of
> image.  I have a large batch of unsharpened scans of various cloud forms and
> skies. In most cases ground detail is minimal or dark.  Do you think there is
> any merit to doing any sharpening to this kind of subject matter?  (Please say
> no - it would make life much easier!)
>
> Ed Verkaik
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.