Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: traffic
on 6/24/04 12:47 PM, Clark Guy at guy.clark@siemens.com wrote:
> hey, everybody!
>
> How about a lively discussion of the importance of bit depth??
>
> How about dye clouds vs. film grain???
>
> (I'm kidding, I'm KIDDING!!)
>
> ;-0
>
> Guy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bernard comolet [mailto:bernard.comolet@club-internet.fr]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:54 PM
> To: Clark Guy
> Subject: [filmscanners] traffic
>
>
> No more traffic on filmscanners ??
>
> Bernard from Angoulême-France
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
> body
Maybe everybody has bought a digital camera!
Seriously, I'm thinking of doing just that. But the trouble is that they
keep getting better so rapidly that I find I must keep waiting!
The ones I find most interesting right now are the Olympus E1 and the Sigma
SD10. But the one I want may be the combination of the two. The Fovian
chip is exciting, but what would you have if Olympus combined that with the
E1 4/3 thing?
My thinking is that there would be fewer problems if one went directly from
a digital image to paper rather than having to scan film. In theory, you
would have eliminated one stage in the process, and that would be greater
simplicity.
The final product I seek includes ~12x18 prints on watercolor paper, using
an Epson 2200....
Berry
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
