[filmscanners] Re: Revive this list?!

["Tony Sleep" <TonySleep@halftone.co.uk>]

Carlisle Landel wrote:

> This is an *incredibly* good list, because the junk to content ratio
> is vanishingly close to zero.  So what if there are long periods of
> silence?  As far as I've been able to see, if somebody has a
> question, it is answered quickly *and* authoritatively.  If somebody
> has something useful to say, then they say it.  Perfect!

I must say that's my view too.

I have very little to say about scanners these days, having moved on to
shooting digital exclusively, and at the same time losing touch with
current models.

I'm still scanning historic stuff, 20+yr old negs needing rescue, a ghastly
business.

I rather think most users are in much the same position, with by now
adequate knowledge and filmscanners they're happy with. There aren't many
new adopters of this now mature technology, which is past its peak, just
like film itself.

Regards

Tony Sleep - http://www.halftone.co.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body