Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Nikon Scanners
Frank Mullins wrote:
> ..., my slide collection consists of over 10,000 slides. While
> I am
> sure I will choose not to digitize all of them, a bulk loader is a
> major
> consideration. Thanks, for bringing this to my attention. To scan
> these one
> at a time would take hundreds, if not thousands, of hours. I assume
> the bulk
> loaders readily handle standard slide mounts. Probably 90% of my
> slides are
> in the older standard Kodak cardboard mounts. The more recent ones
> are the
> Kodak plastic mounts so I hope they would not present a problem.
I have read several reports from people who have used older models of Nikon
slide feeders. As I recall, they found the feeders were very reliable with
plastic slide mounts.
With card mounts there was a risk that the feeder would try to gobble two slides
at the same time, causing a jam. This was easily averted by reducing the size of
an input slot (with, for example, a piece of credit card held on with adhesive
tape).
Does this apply to the current model, does anyone know?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
www.marquis-kyle.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|