Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Lousy results with Nikon LS-2000 & Kodak Gold200?
>It does appear that some films don't get along with certain scanners, or
>at least certain native optical resolutions of some scanners.
>
>To the person who first brought up this thread, have you tried both with
>and without dICE? If it is particularly bad under dICE scans there
>might be residual silver in the film that wasn't properly bleached or
>fixed out of it. Try a scan without dICE on, and see if the results are
>different at all.
no difference whatsoever. Mild difference using Vuescan, but in general, the
results from Kodak Gold 200 leave much to be desired. Looking at the shots it
is as if I was 'digging' into the negs with the scanner because they were so
badly under-exposed. (though they aren't and are plenty dense to the eye)
Dieder
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
