ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Neat Image with Nikon scanners?



From: "Julian Vrieslander" <julianv@mindspring.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Since there is now a Mac version of the Neat Image plugin, I have been
looking at their product info page

<http://www.neatimage.com/mac/index.html>

They don't provide a noise profile for the Nikon film scanners.  I would be
interested in reading comments from any Wintel users who have tried Neat
Image with an LS-4000 or other Nikon scanners.  Are the results better than
what can be achieved with the noise/grain reduction tools in VueScan and
Photoshop CS?
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

With the Nikon 8000, NikonScan, Fuji Velvia 50 and Reala, I found NeatImage
to be nothing other than amazing. As long as your image has a relatively
large smooth area, it can figure out a profile.

It did have one minor problem: processing a 645 scan took 25 minutes. Ouch.
So it has not been part of my workflow.

Since then, they claim they've speeded it up, and I've bought a new computer
that's quite a bit faster, so I'm planning on trying again.

My basic take is that high-res film scans need noise reduction, and
NeatImage does a good job.

There's also NoiseNinja that a lot of peole like, but I don't know if it has
a MAC version.

David J. Littleboy
davidjl@gol.com
Tokyo, Japan


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.